Pentagon vows to act if Russian bounties in Afghanistan are confirmed

Defence officials say reports of payments to Taliban to kill US soldiers 'not corroborated'

FILE -  In this Sept. 18, 2009, file, photo, A soldier from the U.S. Army's 118th Military Police Co., based at Fort Bragg, N.C., respond to shots fired at a combat outpost in the Jalrez Valley in Afghanistan's Wardak Province.  Moscow and Washington are intertwined in a complex and bloody history in Afghanistan, with both suffering thousands of dead and wounded in conflicts lasting for years. Now both superpowers are linked again over Afghanistan, with intelligence reports indicating Russia secretly offered bounties to the Taliban to kill American troops there. But analysts suggest that the two adversaries actually have more in common, especially when it comes to what they want to see in a postwar Afghanistan: a stable country that does not serve as a base for extremists to export terrorism. Both countries also are aligned in their opposition to militants from the Islamic State group.(AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo, File)
Powered by automated translation

Top Pentagon officials pledged on Thursday to take action if the US military could corroborate intelligence suggesting Moscow paid militants linked to the Taliban to kill US soldiers in Afghanistan.

General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Defence Secretary Mark Esper spoke before a congressional committee as the Trump administration comes under pressure to explain media reports claiming the president was briefed on the intelligence but did nothing in response.

Gen Milley said the information was "not corroborated".

"We'll get to the bottom of it. We are going to find out if, in fact, it's true. And if it is true, we will take action," he said, without specifying what kind of action might be taken.

Washington has known for years that Russia has been supporting the Afghan insurgents, including through arms shipments, Gen Milley said.

But, in the case of the Russians, "we do not have concrete corroborating evidence, intelligence to show directing. That's a big difference," he said.

"All the defence intelligence agencies have been unable to corroborate that report," Mr Esper agreed.

Even so, he added: "The commanders take all reports seriously, regardless of the degree of credibility or confidence."

The New York Times, followed by other US media, first reported on the intelligence last month.

The White House has said President Donald Trump was not briefed on the intelligence because it was unverified.

But the Times, citing a number of officials, reported that the intelligence was included in the written presidential daily brief in February.

The newspaper reported that US intelligence officers and special forces in Afghanistan began raising the alarm as early as January, and that the National Security Council held an inter-agency meeting in late March to discuss possible responses – but the White House did not authorise any action.

Russia and the Taliban have denied the claims.

The scandal comes with Mr Trump trying to withdraw troops from conflict-torn Afghanistan – one of the Taliban's key demands – and end America's longest war.