Abu Dhabi, UAEWednesday 22 May 2019

Firefighters faced intolerable choices during Grenfell fire, inquiry told

Some survivors have suggested more lives could have been saved if a total evacuation had been attempted

Grenfell Tower is still a burnt-out shell on the horizon. Hannah McKay
Grenfell Tower is still a burnt-out shell on the horizon. Hannah McKay

London firefighters battling to control the deadly Grenfell Tower blaze faced intolerable choices over whether to direct residents to stay in their homes or try to escape through toxic smoke, a public inquiry has been told.

Firefighting tactics are in focus at the inquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire, Britain’s deadliest on domestic premises since the Second World War, which killed 71 people inside the 24-storey social housing block on June 14 last year.

A fire safety expert and some survivors have suggested that more lives could have been saved if firefighters had attempted a total evacuation rather than advise people to stay in their flats while they tried to bring the fire under control.

In a statement to the public inquiry published on Tuesday, the London Fire Brigade defended its decision to stick to its "stay put" advice until late into the night, saying the magnitude of the blaze had presented unprecedented challenges.

“The LFB control centre was required to handle more calls requiring fire survival guidance from residents within Grenfell Tower on the night of the fire than the total number of such calls in the previous 10 years from the whole of London,” it said.


Read more:

Expert blames "untested" cladding on Grenfell tower over blaze that killed 72

‘No one should die in such a horrific way,’ say Grenfell families

Grenfell Tower is a monument to the tragic inequalities of modern Britain

Grenfell families to miss start of inquiry due to visa delays


Firefighters had found themselves in “intolerable positions” as they had to decide whether to tell people to stay in flats where the air was relatively clean and hope the blaze could eventually be put out or direct them down the staircase which was filled with poisonous smoke.

In the event, the fire engulfed the entire building and no one who stayed inside survived.

The fire brigade said high-rise buildings such as Grenfell Tower were supposed to be designed to contain any fire in its compartment of origin for a long enough period to allow the fire service to extinguish a blaze before it had the chance to spread.

Accordingly, buildings were not designed to allow total evacuation and the best safety advice to occupants was to "stay put" unless directly affected by smoke or fire. The fire brigade said this policy had largely been effective since high-rise housing blocks started appearing in London in the 1950s.

Completed in 1974, Grenfell Tower is owned by the local authority of the borough of Kensington and Chelsea. It had been refurbished between 2012 and 2016, and fire safety experts have told the inquiry that several aspects of those recent works had made the tower unsafe.

In particular, the building was enveloped in a combustible cladding. Once the fire broke out of its point of origin, a fourth-floor apartment, it ignited the cladding and the flames raced to the top of the building in minutes.

The refurbishment is also being examined in exhaustive detail by the public inquiry. Police are conducting a separate criminal investigation, which they say could result in charges against individuals or organisations.

Updated: June 6, 2018 09:44 AM