x Abu Dhabi, UAEFriday 28 July 2017

Militants' raid on Pakistan base raises fears on nuclear site security

If militants get inside a nuclear weapons site, that could lead to calls for a unilateral American move to secure the Muslim world's only nuclear weapons, something likely to trigger massive protests inside Pakistan.

Pakistani soldiers arrive for a military operation against militants at a Karachi naval air base after an attack by militants. Asif Hassan / AFP Photo
Pakistani soldiers arrive for a military operation against militants at a Karachi naval air base after an attack by militants. Asif Hassan / AFP Photo

ISLAMABAD // A raid by militants on a Pakistani naval base this week has raised fresh anxiety about Pakistan's ability to protect its nuclear sites.

Although Western governments and analysts agree there is little chance militants could succeed in stealing nuclear material in an assault like the one in Karachi, attacks by al Qa'eda or the Taliban against a nuclear facility remain a possibility.

A serious breach of the security perimeter could lead to calls for a unilateral American move to secure the Muslim world's only nuclear weapons, something likely to trigger massive protests inside Pakistan and more hostility between Washington and Islamabad - an outcome that would be welcomed by the militants.

While that is unlikely, a scenario that includes more militant attacks on Pakistani security force installations in the coming weeks, possibly nuclear ones is not. That alone could deepen the worry in the United States that the Pakistani army is infiltrated by militants and is unable to protect the weapons.

Kamran Bokhari, a Pakistan expert from Stratfor, a US-based global intelligence firm, said: "These attacks alone do not damage the military, but they shape American fears. More attacks create the perception that the Pakistan state is crumbling and weakening, and that encourages more American unilateral operations, and that serves the jihadists' interest."

Taliban spokesman Ahsanullah Ahsan, in comments to a reporter after claiming responsibility for a bombing on Wednesday that killed five police officers, said future attacks would also target Pakistan's president, prime minister and army chief but nuclear installations would not be targeted because "Pakistan is the only Muslim nuclear power state".

His remarks seemed to be an attempt to appeal to Islamist, rightwing and nationalist public opinion, much of which is prone to conspiracy theories that America wants to steal the country's nuclear assets.

In the past, the Taliban have promised to fight alongside Pakistani troops against India, a similar attempt to win public support even as it routinely kills innocent Pakistanis in suicide bombings.

The army believes the nuclear weapons are the country's main safeguard against Indian aggression, and ensures they are protected to a standard comparable to other countries' weapons, according to analysts and research papers. They are held in bases with much tighter security than the Mehran Naval Station attacked on Sunday in Karachi, in bunkers protected by specially trained security forces.

The army physically separates warhead cores from their detonation components, while the warheads themselves are electronically locked to ensure that they cannot be detonated even if they fall into terrorists' hands.

The Mehran facility is on the grounds of a large air base that has housing complexes and a hospital and borders large residential and commercial areas. Nuclear facilities are isolated and access to them is much more strictly controlled.

While the fear that the weapons may be snatched in a militant raid is considered overstated, a more pressing concern is that the inherently unstable Pakistani government could be ousted by Islamist extremists, and the new dynamics that would bring, including state-sanctioned nuclear proliferation to other countries or militant groups.

The fact that Osama bin Laden was killed by American commandos on May 2 in an army town a short walk from a top Pakistani military academy has added to concerns that elements within the security forces, the most powerful institution in Pakistan, are sympathetic to al Qa'eda.

A US Congressional report on the country's nuclear weapons published this year said: "Some observers fear radical takeover of a government that possesses a nuclear bomb, or proliferation by radical sympathisers within Pakistan's nuclear complex in case of a breakdown of controls.

"While US and Pakistani officials continue to express confidence in controls over Pakistan's nuclear weapons, continued instability in the country could impact these safeguards."

The Nato secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, acknowledged the ongoing concerns about the safety of Pakistan's nuclear weapons during a news conference on Tuesday in Kabul, but said he "felt confident that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is safe and well protected".

"But of course," he added, "it is a matter of concern and we follow the situation closely."

The 18-hour assault on the naval base was one of the most successful militant strikes in over four years of insurgent violence, foreshadowing what many here fear is going to be a long and bloody summer as militants seek to exploit tensions between Pakistan and the United States exposed by the unilateral US raid against bin Laden.

The Pakistani military, already humiliated by not knowing about the presence in their country of the al Qa'eda leader, who was shot dead in Abbottabad, and being unable to detect the US helicopters flying into the country, was again shown during the Karachi attack to be powerless, this time against a domestic threat that for first time destroyed two of its planes.

Few expect any answers on how the attackers got into the complex in Pakistan's largest city, much less the trial of anyone arrested in connection with it. An attack on army headquarters close to the capital, Islamabad, in 2009 was led by a former army nurse who was arrested at the scene. The man, whose name has not been released, has been held without trial since then, and the results of any investigation into that attack have never been public.