x Abu Dhabi, UAEThursday 27 July 2017

Court clears John Terry of racial abuse charges

The magistrate was not convinced that Terry had committed a racially aggravated public order offence in a confrontation with Anton Ferdinand.

John Terry had been relieved of his England captaincy because of the racism cloud over his image.
John Terry had been relieved of his England captaincy because of the racism cloud over his image.

LONDON // John Terry, the Chelsea captain, was cleared yesterday of racially abusing an opponent during a Premier League match after one of the most high-profile trials involving a football player.

The case led to Terry being stripped of the England captaincy by the English Football Association ahead of the European Championship and the departure of coach Fabio Capello who disagreed with the decision.

But after hearing four days of evidence at a London court, chief magistrate Howard Riddle found he was not convinced that Terry had committed a racially aggravated public order offence in a confrontation with Anton Ferdinand, the Queens Park Rangers player, during the match in October.

Terry's legal team said in a statement: "He did not racially abuse Mr Ferdinand and the court has accepted this."

Terry maintained he only used an offensive term sarcastically to counter the obscenity he claims Ferdinand was accusing him of using. It followed Ferdinand goading Terry about an alleged extra-marital affair with then-England teammate Wayne Bridge's former girlfriend.

And Riddle was persuaded by the defence claim that Terry could have misheard "Bridge" as "black", prompting his belief that a claim of racism was being wrongly claimed.

"It is highly unlikely that Mr Ferdinand accused Mr Terry on the pitch of calling him a black [expletive]," Riddle wrote in his judgment.

"However I accept that it is possible that Mr Terry believed at the time, and believes now, that such an accusation was made.

"The prosecution evidence as to what was said by Mr Ferdinand at this point is not strong. Mr [Ashley] Cole [the Chelsea defender] gives corroborating [although far from compelling corroborating] evidence on this point. It is therefore possible that what he said was not intended as an insult, but rather as a challenge to what he believed had been said to him."

There were cheers in Court One at Westminster Magistrates' Court from members of Terry's family after the verdict.

"We are pleased that John can now put his mind to football and go back to training and do what he's done for many years," said Bruce Buck, the Chelsea chairman, outside Westminster Magistrates' Court.

Riddle said there was no evidence Terry has lied and called him a "credible witness".

"The lip readers do not provide evidence that categorically contradicts his account," he said of the incident that spread on YouTube after the game. "What may at first sight have seemed clear to the non-expert, is less clear now. There are limitations to lip reading, even by an expert. I have assessed John Terry as a credible witness."

Ferdinand had been reluctant to pursue a criminal case, which was prompted by an off-duty police officer making the complaint. Prosecutors accepted the verdict, but defended the decision to take action.

"The very serious allegation at the heart of this case was one of racial abuse," said Alison Saunders, the chief crown prosecutor for London. "It was our view that this was not 'banter' on the football pitch and that the allegation should be judged by a court.

"The chief magistrate agreed that Mr Terry had a case to answer, but having heard all of the evidence he acquitted Mr Terry of a racially aggravated offence."

Terry had faced a maximum fine of US$3,900 (Dh14,325) if found guilty in a case that was heard without a jury.

twitter Follow us @SprtNationalUAE