Many stumbling blocks on the road to productive peace talks
There are many flies waiting to spoil the ointment of the Middle East peace talks, not least Israel's recent announcement of a rash of settlement-building. That triggered an angry letter to Washington last week from the Palestinian leadership. But one major stumbling block has barely registered with observers: the fifth of Israel's population who are not Jews but Palestinians.
The difficulty posed to the peace process by this Palestinian minority was illustrated in the defining moment of the last notable effort to reach an agreement, initiated in Oslo two decades ago.
In 1993 Yitzhak Rabin, then prime minister, assembled a 15-person delegation for the signing ceremony with the Palestinians at the White House. The delegation was selected to suggest that all sectors of Israeli society favoured peace.
When Rabin was asked why he had not included a single Palestinian, he waved aside the question: "We are going to sign a peace treaty between Jewish Israel and the PLO."
Rabin believed his own Palestinian citizens should be represented not by their government but by the adversary across the table. The mood 20 years on is unchanged. The Palestinian minority is still viewed as a fifth column, one a Jewish state would be better off without.
Significantly, it was a matter relating to Israel's Palestinian citizens that nearly scuppered the start of these talks. Israeli cabinet ministers revolted at a precondition from Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian leader, that the release of long-term political prisoners should include a handful of inmates from Israel's Palestinian minority.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, won a majority in the cabinet only after agreeing to postpone freeing this group until an unspecified time.
Similarly, previous experience suggests there will be an eruption of outrage should Mr Netanyahu's promised referendum on an agreement depend for its outcome - given the likely split between Israeli Jews - on the votes of Palestinian citizens. A senior minister, Silvan Shalom, has already indicated that only Israeli Jews should decide.
But Israel's Palestinian minority will be thrust into the heart of the negotiations much before that.
Last weekend Mr Netanyahu picked at one of the Israeli right's favourite sores, denouncing reported comments from Mr Abbas that no Israeli should be allowed to remain inside a future Palestinian state. Why, asks the right, should Israelis - meaning the settlers - be expelled from a Palestinian state while Israel is left with a large and growing Palestinian population inside its borders?
A possible solution promulgated by Mr Netanyahu's ally Avigdor Lieberman would redraw the borders to expel as many Palestinian citizens as possible in exchange for the settlements. There is a practical flaw, however: a land swap would rid Israel only of those Palestinians living near the West Bank.
Mr Netanyahu prefers another option. He has required of the Palestinian Authority that it recognise Israel as a Jewish state. This condition will take centre stage at the talks.
Leaders of the Palestinian minority in Israel are intensively lobbying the PA to reject the demand. According to a recent report by the International Crisis Group, Palestinian officials are still undecided. Some fear the PA may agree to recognition if it clears the way to an agreement.
Why does this matter to Israel? In the event there is a deal on Palestinian statehood, Israel will wake up the next morning to an intensified campaign for equal rights from the Palestinian minority. In such circumstances, Israel will not be able to plead "security" to justify continuing systematic discrimination.
The Palestinian minority's first demand for equality is not in doubt: a right of return allowing their relatives in exile to join them inside Israel is little different from the current Law of Return that allows any Jew in the world instantly to become a citizen.
The stakes are high: without the Law of Return, Israel's Jewishness is finished; with it, Israel's trumpeted democracy is exposed as empty.
Mr Netanyahu is acutely sensitive to these dangers. Recognition of Israel's Jewishness would pull the rug from under the minority's equality campaign. If you don't want to live in a Jewish state, Mr Netanyahu will tell Palestinian citizens, go live in Palestine. That is what Mr Abbas, your leader, agreed.
Mr Netanyahu's visceral contempt for the rights of the Palestinian minority was alluded to in a recent parliamentary debate. When an Arab MP commented, "We were here before you and will remain [here] after you", an indignant Mr Netanyahu broke protocol to interrupt: "The first part isn't true, and the second won't be."
Recent government moves suggest that his latter observation may not be simply an idle boast but a carefully crafted threat. Israel is preparing to expel tens of thousands of Bedouin citizens from their homes in the Negev into urban reservations as part of a forced relocation plan. This ethnic cleansing campaign sets a dangerous precedent, hinting at what may lie ahead for Israel's other Palestinian communities.
The minority has taken to the streets in the most widespread internal Palestinian protests seen since the eruption of the second intifada. Israeli police have responded with extreme brutality, using levels of violence that would never be contemplated against Jewish demonstrators.
At the same time, Mr Netanyahu's government has introduced legislation to raise the threshold for parties seeking entry to the Knesset. The main victims will be the three small Arab parties represented there. The law's aim, analysts note, is to engineer an Arab-free Knesset, guaranteeing the right's continuing and unchallengeable domination.
Mr Netanyahu, it seems, doubts he can rely on the PA either to supply him with the political surrender he needs from the peace process or to recognise his state's Jewishness. Instead he is bypassing Mr Abbas to protect against the threat posed by his Palestinian citizens' demand for equality.
Jonathan Cook is an independent journalist based in Nazareth
Updated: August 14, 2013 04:00 AM