Winning a $1.54bn prize draw may still not make you rich
The Mega Millions winner in the US may have netted a fortune, but will they be able to hang onto their wealth?
One winner finally emerged for the $1.537 billion (Dh5.61bn) Mega Millions jackpot last week. Research suggests the as-yet unidentified winner may not be so lucky.
The jackpot swelled to that huge sum after the 25 drawings held since the end of July failed to yield a winner. That makes it the second-largest lottery grand prize the world has ever seen. The record came in 2016, when the rival Powerball game hit $1.6bn. The Mega Millions was earlier estimated at $1.6bn as well, but came down after tickets were tallied.
The odds of winning are very small, or about 1 in 303 million. You are about 400 times more likely to be hit by lightning. If every adult in the US purchased just one ticket, each with a different number, there would still be a good chance – about 7 per cent – that no winner emerges at a given drawing and the pot would grow even larger.
But once a winner is declared and claims the prize, a more interesting question arises: What happens to all that money and the “lucky” ticket holder? As research by myself and others shows, it’s often not what you’d expect.
A smaller prize than it seems
The first thing to bear in mind is that while the jackpot is eye-wateringly large, the actual payout will be much less.
If someone claims it, the winner would not actually receive $1.537bn in one big cheque the next day. As a single winner, he or she can either choose a lump sum payment that amounts to about $878 million or receive $1.537bn worth of annual payments that get progressively higher over 30 years.
After that, the US taxman gets to take a big bite. If the winner comes from a state without a lottery tax like Florida or Texas and chooses a lump sum, the federal government will take about $211m of that, leaving $667m. The winning ticket was reportedly bought in South Carolina, which would take 7 per cent, leaving the holder with about $606m.
That jackpot is starting to look a lot smaller, though it’s still a fair chunk of change.
Where windfalls go
The conventional wisdom is that winning the lottery will change your life. While that’s probably always true, research suggests not always in the way you might hope.
Economists Guido Imbens and Bruce Sacerdote and statistician Donald Rubin showed in a 2001 paper that people tend to spend unexpected windfalls. Looking at lottery winners approximately 10 years after winning showed they saved just 16 cents of every dollar won.
In my own research, I found that the average person in their 20s, 30s and 40s who was given an inheritance or large financial gift quickly lost half the money through spending or poor investments.
And other studies have found that winning the lottery generally did not help financially distressed people escape their troubles and instead only postponed the inevitable bankruptcy. One found that a third of lottery winners go bankrupt.
It’s not easy to blow it all
So how exactly could a lottery winner blow through hundreds of millions of dollars so quickly? It’s not easy.
Demographic research on lottery players’ characteristics shows that lottery playing peaks when people are in the 30-39 age range and actually falls as people get older. And the average person in the US lives to the age of 79.
So that means, assuming the winner is in her 30s, she would have about 45 years or so to spend the lump after-tax sum of, let’s say, $900m. That means she would have to spend a bit less than $20m a year or roughly $55,000 per day to burn through it all – even more when you factor in interest accrued while it sits in the bank.
In addition, really blowing it all means the winner has no assets to show for it. If he uses the money to buy luxury homes, Banksy paintings and Ferraris and Aston Martins, his net worth would not actually change and he’d be able to retire with his wealth intact – assuming the investments kept their value or rose.
Blowing through the money, which leads to bankruptcy and low savings rates, means the winner has nothing to show for his spending besides a good time.
Riches to rags
And that’s basically what a man named Huntington Hartford did.
Mr Hartford, who lived from 1911 to 2008, was the heir to the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company fortune. This company, which started just before the Civil War, is better known as the A&P supermarket chain. A&P was the first US coast-to-coast food store, and from the First World War to the 1960s was what Walmart is for today’s American shoppers.
Mr Hartford inherited approximately $90m when he was 12. Adjusting for inflation means he was given over $1.3bn as a child, after taxes. Yet Mr Hartford declared bankruptcy in New York in 1992, approximately 70 years after being handed one of the largest fortunes in the world.
This is because he had the reverse Midas touch. He lost millions buying real estate, creating an art museum and sponsoring theatres and shows. He combined poor business skills with an exceptionally lavish lifestyle. After declaring bankruptcy, he lived as a recluse with a daughter in the Bahamas until he died.
Mr Hartford’s life story, coupled with academic research, shows that coming into a windfall of cash does not always have a happy ending. Squandering that money is easier than it seems.
For those that entered the draw and did not win, better luck next time.
Nevertheless, one key lesson, whether you play or not, is that when you get a windfall or win the lottery, plan ahead and resist the all-too-human temptation to spend all the money.
* Associated Press
Updated: October 27, 2018 01:00 PM