Abu Dhabi, UAEMonday 26 August 2019

China’s $1 trillion sovereign wealth fund has gone quiet

In its glory days, it was a vehicle for ambitious overseas investments

Bank of Communications in Beijing. Lenders in China are key to getting economy moving again. Reuters
Bank of Communications in Beijing. Lenders in China are key to getting economy moving again. Reuters

China’s sovereign wealth fund was set up in 2007 to much fanfare. It was supposed to be a vehicle that helped invest the country’s massive pile of foreign-exchange reserves abroad through big-ticket deals.

For about a decade, it did just that. At the height of the financial crisis, China Investment Corporation sank $5.6 billion into Morgan Stanley to steady the struggling bank, a stake that eventually rose to 10 per cent. The fund tried to emulate Singapore’s GIC, which was known for its ambitious investments overseas.

Now CIC — the world’s second-biggest sovereign wealth fund, with almost $1 trillion in assets — seems to have gone small-time. The fund hasn't received any new money for offshore investing since 2012, when it was given $50bn on top of its initial $200bn starter kit. It’s gone from being on investment bankers’ speed dials to near irrelevance overseas.

Its new chairman may not be able to change that. Peng Chun, who’s filling a two-year-old vacancy, had been chairman at Bank of Communications since last February (he was vice chairman for the five years before that). Mr Peng succeeds Ding Xuedong, who left in February 2017 for the State Council.

At Bocom, China's fifth-largest bank by assets, Mr Peng’s efforts to internationalise went slowly. That’s a worrying signal for market watchers hoping CIC will rise to its former glory. Bocom’s overseas revenue rose to 13.29bn yuan ($1.98bn) last year, which amounts to 6.2 per cent of total net revenue, from 11.53bn yuan, or 5.8 per cent. Its exposure abroad also has been underwhelming, comprising 8.7 per cent of assets, behind Bank of China and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

For CIC, some of this retreat could come down to its years without a chairman. The fund also might be showing a cautious streak, after getting burnt by its investments in commodity companies that went bust, and losing money on its bailout of Morgan Stanley. CIC’s stake in Blackstone Group, which it exited in 2018 after more than a decade, suffered paper losses in its early years.

The fund’s last major overseas venture was a 12.25bn euro ($14.2bn) acquisition of European logistics company Logicor from Blackstone's real-estate fund in 2017 — CIC’s biggest-ever purchase. The deal caught even more attention because it proceeded despite Beijing’s efforts to stem capital outflows and a successive crackdown on global property tie-ups. It also stands in stark contrast to the fund’s latest endeavours, which are more passive and smaller-scale. Last year, CIC invested in a 150 million-euro tech fund with Ireland and a $1.5bn fund with Goldman Sachs Group focused on American companies with business interests in China.

Bringing CIC back to the good old days will be an uphill battle for Mr Peng, not just because fresh funds are lacking. Both of his predecessors had deep political connections: Mr Ding spent most of his career as a senior official with the Ministry of Finance, and Lou Jiwei, an outspoken Community Party veteran, eventually became finance minister. As chairman of state-owned Bocom, Mr Peng was technically a Beijing appointee; but his background in government is minimal. That could complicate any efforts to grow overseas at a time when such ambitions require a dose of political capital.

Externally, CIC not only faces a world sceptical of Chinese purchases but an unappealing investment backdrop. After posting its best annual return on overseas investments in 2017, last year’s performance was “certainly” worse because of global market fluctuations, its general manager told Bloomberg News last month.

Ultimately, CIC’s desire to earn stable returns by reducing exposure to volatile equity investments in favour of alternative assets could backfire. Real estate has been a no-go area since late 2016. Hedge funds and private equity require a talent pool that CIC doesn’t have after a major exodus over the past year. Mr Peng will have his work cut out.

Updated: April 8, 2019 01:55 PM

SHARE

SHARE