Russia's rude economic health may be more a mirage
Mounting distrust of growth figures provided by official statistics agency Rosstat even within the country
Russia’s official statistics agency is displaying a feverish optimism under its new boss, Pavel Malkov, who took office in December.
On Monday, the agency reported that in 2018, the country’s economy grew the fastest since 2012. Coming on top of a recent data revision that eliminated the 2016 recession, the recent numbers seem increasingly fishy, including to some government economists.
On December 20, President Vladimir Putin was asked at a news conference why Russia’s economic statistics looked rosier than people’s actual lives would suggest and whether the data could be trusted. Mr Putin admitted the statistics were “not perfect” and needed to be improved.
A mere four days later, Alexander Surinov, head of Rosstat, the official statistical agency, was asked to resign and Mr Malkov, a former Economics Ministry official, was appointed in his place. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov commented on December 24 that the quality of Rosstat’s data was “terrible” in some areas, such as people’s incomes (which went down in four of the previous six months) and inflation (which was higher than government forecasts for most of the year).
Before Mr Malkov’s first week in office was over, Rosstat issued a major revision to 2016 and 2017 gross domestic product data. It corrected the 0.2 per cent drop in output in 2016 to growth of 0.3 per cent, asserting that the recession that followed a steep decline of oil prices in the fall of 2014 and the introduction of western sanctions against Russia only lasted a year. Rosstat also corrected upward the 2017 growth number, to 1.6 per cent from 1.5 per cent.
On Monday, Rosstat released 2018 growth data: 2.3 per cent for the year. That beat every one of the 36 forecasts tracked by Bloomberg. The highest of those was 2.1 per cent, and it was an outlier; 1.7 per cent was the consensus.
The likely reason is a jump in Rosstat’s estimate of the increase in construction activity. The agency initially estimated a rise for January through November at 0.5 per cent, but a revised estimate in January put the increase at 5.3 per cent for the full year. The jump fixed an earlier incongruity in Russian statistics: Rosstat had reported a large increase in investment in the third quarter of the year that didn’t quite dovetail with stagnating construction.
There’s an innocuous explanation for the construction jump: Novatek finished its $27 billion liquefied natural gas facility on the Yamal Peninsula in north-west Siberia, and a large part of the project was likely registered by Rosstat in 2018 even if the actual construction took place earlier. But the credibility of Rosstat’s numbers is questionable.
On January 2, Alexei Kudrin, who heads Russia’s budget watchdog, the Accounting Chamber, and who served as finance minister before Mr Siluanov, tweeted that Russia’s GDP likely increased by 1.5 per cent in 2018. Even after Rosstat released its optimistic estimate of 2.3 per cent on Monday, another prominent government economist, Andrei Klepach of the state development bank VEB, also estimated the 2018 economic expansion at 1.5 per cent. “I’m not inclined to trust anything else for now,” Mr Klepach told the state-owned news agency TASS.
Whether or not the pessimism of Mr Kudrin and Mr Klepach is justified, Rosstat has a clear incentive to massage numbers. Mr Putin’s approval is down, and Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev’s numbers are suffering even more. For the first time since 2013, a plurality of Russians say the country is going down the wrong path. As Mr Putin looks for ways to boost his popularity and reduce the potential for mass protest, firing Mr Medvedev and reshuffling the unpopular cabinet, perhaps even starting corruption investigations against some top economic officials, look like attractive options.
Mr Putin likes statistics and is proud of his ability to keep a lot of economic data in his head. Giving him good numbers to juggle could be a matter of survival for the government.
The recent revisions and the 2018 growth estimate are nothing if not bold. Even if the seeds were planted under Mr Surinov, Mr Malkov, the young careerist who succeeded him, won’t find it easy to release disappointing data after this burst of optimism. He’s promised to modernise Rosstat and bring it fully into the digital age. But “Garbage In, Garbage Out” is one of the key rules of our data-driven era. In today’s Russia, dealing in garbage could be better for self-preservation than recording faithfully what’s going on in the economy.
In any case, economists following Russia should watch Rosstat’s hands especially carefully now.
Updated: February 5, 2019 03:35 PM