x

Abu Dhabi, UAEWednesday 19 December 2018

British regulators slap $1.5m fine on Barclays CEO for attempst to unmask whistleblower

The regulatory fine is the first ever such penalty for the sitting chief executive of a major bank in Britain

Barclays' chief executive Jes Staley arrives at 10 Downing Street in London. He has been fined by Brtitish regulators for attempting to uncover a whisteblower. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo
Barclays' chief executive Jes Staley arrives at 10 Downing Street in London. He has been fined by Brtitish regulators for attempting to uncover a whisteblower. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls/File Photo

British regulators and Barclays have fined the bank's chief executive Jes Staley a combined 1.1 million pounds ($1.5 million) after he tried to identify a whistleblower who sent letters criticising an employee of the bank.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Bank of England's Prudential Regulation Authority said on Friday they had together fined Staley 642,000 pounds. That included a 30 per cent discount for him agreeing at an early stage to settle.

Barclays imposed a 500,000 pound cut to his 2016 pay.

The regulatory fine is the first ever such penalty for the sitting CEO of a major bank in Britain, and cast a pall over Staley's efforts to show the bank has improved its culture since the freewheeling days of before the 2007-8 financial crisis.

"Mr Staley’s actions fell short of the standard of due skill, care and diligence expected of a CEO in a regulated firm," the FCA said.

Regulators said the fine was only 10 percent of his overall pay package. Staley, a 61-year old American and former JPMorgan banker who took the helm at Barclays in December 2015, at one stage appeared at risk of losing his job over the probe.

"I have consistently acknowledged that my personal involvement in this matter was inappropriate, and I have apologised for mistakes which I made," Staley said in the bank's statement on Friday.

The regulatory findings will also be closely read by lawmakers keen to ensure top banking officials are held accountable for their actions at a time when there are growing calls to better protect whistleblowers.

The regulators stopped short of saying Staley was unfit to continue in his role, after he twice attempted to find out who wrote letters raising "concerns of a personal nature" about an unidentified senior employee.

"Mr Staley acted unreasonably in proceeding in this way and, in doing so, risked undermining confidence in Barclays’ whistleblowing policy and the protections it afforded to whistleblowers," the FCA said.

_______________

Read more:

Central banks nervous at prospect of a trade war

IMF says global growth to slow in medium term as it warns of trade war harm

_______________

Tracking down the whistleblower became a transatlantic effort, the regulators' report showed.

A copy of the envelope of the first letter was sent by Staley's office via group security to a Barclays employee in the United States "who engaged with their contacts in the U.S. to try and identify the author".

These "contacts" provided the date, time, location and cost of buying postage for the first letter.

Group security then made a fruitless attempt to obtain "video footage" of the person who bought postage for the first letter, the report said.

It was the regulators' first case brought under Britain's new senior managers regime (SMR), a post financial crisis reform aimed at making top staff directly accountable for their actions.

Barclays is subject to the first ever requirements to tell regulators annually about any whistleblowing cases made against senior managers, and any cases where Barclays has sought to identify anonymous whistleblowers.

The bank's "whistleblowers' champions", who come under the SMR, will also have to attest personally each year on the soundness of Barclays' whistleblowing systems.

Barclays said in April last year it had reprimanded Staley and would cut his bonus as the two financial watchdogs launched a year-long investigation into his actions.

Authorities in the United States are still investigating the case.

Updated: May 11, 2018 04:05 PM

SHARE

SHARE