Abu Dhabi, UAETuesday 25 June 2019

Weinstein Company bid unacceptable to New York

Attorney general Eric Schneiderman said he wants new deal and Harvey Weinstein’s brother Robert off board

Mr Schneiderman is seeking steep financial penalties from Mr Weinstein, his brother and the New York-based firm
Mr Schneiderman is seeking steep financial penalties from Mr Weinstein, his brother and the New York-based firm

New York attorney general Eric Schneiderman said an offer to buy Harvey Weinstein’s film and TV company is not acceptable in its current form and he wants Weinstein’s brother Robert off the board.

Mr Schneiderman sued Harvey Weinstein and his company, adding to the embattled movie producer’s legal troubles and dealing a major setback to efforts to find a buyer for the Weinstein company and avert its bankruptcy. More than 100 jobs are at stake.

Harvey Weinstein created a hostile work environment, with some employees being subjected to “pervasive sexual harassment,” intimidation and discrimination, according to the lawsuit, filed on Sunday in New York state court. The 65-year-old mogul is trying to sell the studio to Maria Contreras-Sweet, a former Obama administration official, in a $500 million bid backed by billionaire Ron Burkle.

Mr Schneiderman, who spent four months investigating the company, said at a news conference on Monday the sale might leave victims “without adequate redress, including a lack of a sufficient victims’ compensation fund”. It would also keep victims “muzzled by insidious non-disclosure agreements,” he said.

The lawsuit does not aim to block the sale to Ms Contreras-Sweet’s group, the attorney general said, but was filed to protect the employees.

“Any sale of the Weinstein Company must ensure that victims will be compensated, employees will be protected going forward, and that neither perpetrators nor enablers will be unjustly enriched,” Mr Schneiderman said. “There was clearly a systemic breakdown in the company’s legal obligations, in their compliance.”

Weinstein, who faces a wave of sexual assault claims stretching back to the 1970s, was ousted from his studio in October 2017 after the New York Times and the New Yorker magazine published accounts in which women accused him of sexual harassment and rape. He has denied any non-consensual activity.

A string of actresses have come forward to accuse the producer of sexually harassing or raping them. Actress Dominique Huett claimed Weinstein performed an act on himself in front of her and then on her in 2010. She sued his studio for $5 million. Actress Uma Thurman, who starred in some of Weinstein’s hit movies, such as Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill, has also accused the producer of assaulting her in London in 1994.

“We believe that a fair investigation by Mr Schneiderman will demonstrate that many of the allegations against Harvey Weinstein are without merit,” his lawyer Ben Brafman said. “While Mr Weinstein’s behaviour was not without fault, there certainly was no criminality, and at the end of the inquiry it will be clear that Harvey Weinstein promoted more women to key executive positions than any other industry leader.”

Weinstein intends to fight the lawsuit if Mr Schneiderman seeks to “scapegoat” him, the lawyer added.

In the lawsuit, Mr Schneiderman seeks steep financial penalties from Weinstein, his brother and the New York-based firm; victim restitution; and a court order that would invalidate non-disclosure agreements signed by women who had contact with the producer.

Mr Schneiderman said on Monday that his office attempted to alert the purchasers about the results of its investigation, hoping that an accord could be reached and policies implemented that would protect victims and employees, but said he was rebuffed.

The studio said that its board is disappointed with the lawsuit as many of the allegations are inaccurate. There is no truth to any suggestion that the studio impeded its suitor’s access to the state’s attorney general and the company looks forward to bringing the situation to an appropriate resolution, according to the statement.

“When an attorney for a purchaser says ‘Why should we talk to you?’ that tells you all you need to hear,” Mr Schneiderman said. “One of the things we’re seeking is cooperation. If I were trying to purchase the assets of the company, I would want to negotiate a settlement of this complaint as part of the deal.”

Mr Schneiderman also said he was getting resistance from Weinstein company officials, saying while his investigators have obtained a “form” of Weinstein’s personnel file, they were told “the physical personnel file had gone missing, which is another issue of concern for us.”

Ms Contreras-Sweet, the former head of the Small Business Administration under Barack Obama, offered to buy Weinstein’s studio and replace current directors with a majority of women. Ms Contreras-Sweet’s investment group would assume most of the liabilities of the Weinstein Company and create a fund to compensate victims of sexual harassment. The offer was for $500m including an assumption of $225m of debt, according to a source close to the deal.

While the parties were still working on the terms when the suit was filed, 15 per cent of the emerging company would have been owned by Mr Burkle, the source said. David Glasser was lined up as chief executive, according to Variety – a proposal Mr Schneiderman called unacceptable. Mr Glasser is chief operating officer at the Weinstein Company and has been at the company for almost a decade. A decision on who would lead the company has n’t been made.

Mr Burkle also has a long-standing relationship with the Weinstein Company, credited as an executive producer on films such as August: Osage County and the recent sequel to Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, according to IMDB.com.

The attorney general said the Weinstein Xompany has repeatedly turned a blind eye to its co-founder’s sexual misconduct. Mr Schneiderman said his investigation found there have been not only “dozens” of formal complaints against Harvey Weinstein during his 12 years as movie studio head but also “many more informal complaints.” Not once had company management or human resources conducted any investigation, as required by law, Mr Schneiderman said.

“The company’s management was complicit in this pattern of misconduct,” Mr Schneiderman said. “David Glasser who supervised the human resources department did not stop this discrimination, harassment and abuse even though he was in charge of handling dozens of shocking complaints.”

The suit details numerous instances where Harvey Weinstein, identified in the complaint by his initials, allegedly assaulted, harassed or intimidated female employees. It claims that groups of women at the firm were compelled to facilitate his “sexual conquests” as a condition of employment.

Updated: February 13, 2018 10:23 AM