Text size:

  • Small
  • Normal
  • Large

Hassan Hassan

Columnist

Our Journalists

Latest Articles

More from this author

On Topic

Favourite Articles

Latest Comments

intensional

Very helpful article, but: a revolution never gets everyone, even those broadly sympathetic, onside. That should not be regarded as a failure.

D. Glass

I still cannot understand how a man's word alone can be taken into account when considering the life and livelihood of another person. Without a picture of the 'rude' act or an unbiased witness to corroborate the 'crime', a person's very existence can be in question. People can be torn from their families and placed in jail for something that did not happen. Does the judge take the character of the accuser into account or only their nationality? How do innocent people protect themselves from this? If someone is endangering my life by tailgating at high speed, can I sue THEM? Of course I cannot sue them unless an accident happens and there is evidence that the act caused damage. However, it seems than that a person's 'honor' requires no physical evidence whatsoever to prove 'damage.' Someone PLEASE explain to me how this makes sense!!