main content

Comment

Global briefing

  • Jihadist ideology is now under attack from its erstwhile proponents. A Libyan group has issued a new religious document denouncing the tactics used by al Qa'eda as illegal under Islamic law.

You make the news

Send us your stories and pictures

Make no mistake: this rage could tear America apart

James Zogby

  • Last Updated: August 09. 2009 10:46PM UAE / August 9. 2009 6:46PM GMT

There is a social movement stirring on the far right of American politics and it bodes ill for the future of the United States.

It is, in the classic sense, a movement, not an organisation, with no coherent structure, no creed or litmus test for membership. Rather, it represents disparate currents, born of transformative developments and traumatic events that have had an impact on the US in recent decades.


This movement has manifested itself in several forms. There are the anti-immigrant armed militias patrolling the southern border keeping out “illegals”. There are also the “tax party” demonstrators, many of whom have morphed into the angry chanting mobs that are now disrupting Congressional town meetings over health-care reform. And there are the so-called “birthers”, a not so small fringe on the far right, who question Barack Obama’s birth in the US and therefore his right to hold the office of president.


If the individuals involved in these currents have anything in common, it is that they are angry and alienated and have identified “government” as a source of their problems and, therefore, as a target of their wrath.

Behind all of this discontent, of course, are real problems. The economic crisis in America did not just begin with the collapse of the financial sector in the autumnn of 2008. For years now, the US economy has undergone a steady transformation. The loss of the country’s manufacturing base has resulted in dramatic social dislocation, causing the collapse of many once prosperous and stable communities. As factories closed, not only were jobs lost and economic security threatened, but people were forced to move, neighbourhoods died and families were at risk.


All during the 1990s, despite gains on Wall Street, many middle-class Americans were being squeezed. Real incomes declined, while the costs of health care, education and basic commodities rose, resulting not only in a declining standard of living for many, but, for the first time in American history, a significant portion of the middle class beginning to question whether their children would be able to achieve the same economic status as their parents.


The traumas of 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina presented a double jolt, shaking to an even greater degree American’s sense of security and their confidence in the government’s ability to perform.

Add to this a nativist/racist current, fuelled by large numbers of immigrants from the south and fear of new foreigners (especially, after 9/11, Muslims), and the persistent presence of anti-black sentiment, and you have the ingredients of the lethal brew that is now coming to a boil.


All of this, however, did not erupt spontaneously. It was helped: fuelled by fires set by those who sought, in ways subtle and not so subtle, to exploit the fears afoot across the land. Radical talk-show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Mike Savage, Fox News and even CNN’s Lou Dobbs exploited these issues – as did George Bush’s political adviser, Karl Rove, who used it to achieve electoral success. Even Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign playbook tapped into these currents, as did the McCain/Palin campaign strategists.


And so here is America in the midst of a hot summer, with “birthers” fulminating about Obama’s “foreignness”, angry mobs breaking up town meetings, and polling numbers showing a deepening partisan divide across the nation..

All the while these events are unfolding, analysts and commentators are spending endless hours of airtime observing and pointing accusing fingers, without making any effort to understand how this came to be and where it can go. Some conservatives are surely at fault for thinking they can simply exploit this anger, turning it on and then off, at will. And some liberals, too, are at fault for dismissing the anger they see, suggesting that it is simply manufactured and artificial and, therefore, can be ignored.


I am reminded of similar developments that occurred in 1919 at the beginning of the “Red Scare.” Then too, a national movement, fuelled by fears of immigration, economic dislocation and war-time anti-foreign bigotry was exploited by some and ignored by others, until it grew out of control – with lethal consequences.

If Americans are not careful and understanding, and if they do not start now, both to address this troubling anger and alienation, and to hold accountable those who are stoking the embers of discontent, they could end up in the throes of a full-fledged nativist siege that could tear apart the fabric of the nation.


Dr James J Zogby is president of the Arab American Institute in Washington


Added: 08/10/09 01:33:00 AM

This is to be expected. Unlike the 3rd world countries where people live hand to mouth and is simply driven by necessity, the western countries have lost this resilient attitude thanks to false economic system sold to the world as a modern finance system. The gap between have and have not is increasing in every countries where the economic model is based on the capitalism and exploitation with long term dire consequence. Every civilisation has turning point. Perhaps what is happening in US and in the Europe is just that - regressing due to its own insecurity. The fallout of this is going to be felt everywhere and there seems to be no steps taken to mitigate against this here in this Gulf region.

Joe Blog, london

Please log in to post a comment